Mental Resilience, Cognitive Canaries & High-Stakes Decision Making with Retired Poker Pro Chris Sparks

About the guest
Chris Sparks
Chris Sparks is the founder of Forcing Function, where he teaches performance frameworks to investors, executives, founders, and teams. A retired professional poker player once ranked among the top players in the world, he is the author of Experiment Without Limits, leads workshops on decision-making, systems thinking, and peak performance, and hosts the Forcing Function Hour podcast.
Learn more →Listen to the episode
Build the system before stress narrows your options
Chris Sparks spent years as one of the top-ranked online poker players in the world, where a single tired, tilted session could cost tens of thousands of dollars. His edge came from fast feedback loops: notice what helps, strip out what degrades performance, tighten the loop, make the next decision from a cleaner state.
The nervous-system lesson is direct. When arousal rises, attention narrows, rationalization gets louder, and the body often starts acting before the conscious mind has chosen. Most people I talk to already know this about themselves. They just don't have structures in place for when it happens. Chris does, and the structures are surprisingly simple: pre-commit to conditions, cues, and policies that your stressed self can still follow.
This guide covers five moves from our conversation:
- run a pre-performance routine before stakes rise;
- use "Murphy Jitsu" to prepare for failure without spiraling;
- identify objective canaries that tell you your state is drifting;
- convert those canaries into if-then policies;
- review the system often enough that resilience becomes trainable.
Run a five-minute power-up before the performance begins
Chris's pre-session routine was built around one sentence: I have done what I can control to create the conditions for success. That mattered because poker outcomes contain luck, timing, and other people's decisions. A routine separated process from results, which made bad outcomes easier to metabolize without turning them into identity threats.
You can adapt his routine before a pitch, negotiation, difficult conversation, writing sprint, investment decision, or any moment where your state changes your decisions.
Use this checklist:
- Resource the body. Water, food, temperature, bathroom, chair, light, anything that might become an avoidable distraction later.
- Clear the attentional field. Phone away, notifications off, irrelevant tabs closed, loose tasks captured somewhere you trust.
- Prime the physiology. Stretch, breathe slowly, feel your feet, lengthen your exhale, notice posture before the stakes are live.
- Choose the soundscape. Chris used music as an "emotional cheat code," with higher-BPM tracks when he needed energy and ambient music when he needed to slow down.
- Visualize the desired process. "I make clean decisions. I notice my body. I ask the right question. I pause before replying."
- Review the decision context. What matters here? What tendencies, constraints, or patterns should you remember before entering?
The specific content doesn't need to be sacred. What matters is that it's repeatable, short enough to actually do, and clearly linked to the version of yourself you want making the next decision. Research on pre-performance rituals suggests they can reduce anxiety and improve performance in some tasks, but treat your routine as something to test and refine, not a guaranteed fix.1
1A pre-performance routine controls the conditions you bring into the room. The outcome takes care of itself from there.
Practice "Murphy Jitsu" without turning it into catastrophic rumination
Chris's name for a premortem is Murphy Jitsu: before you do something important, imagine it has gone badly, then ask why.
Finding a failure mode in your imagination costs almost nothing compared to discovering it after you've sent the email, entered the meeting, wired the money, or escalated the argument.
Try the three-minute version:
- Name the action. "I am about to send this proposal / have this conversation / start this session."
- Jump forward. "It went poorly. The result was disappointing."
- Ask why. "What are the three most likely reasons?"
- Sort controllable from uncontrollable. Don't waste the exercise trying to prevent weather, luck, or other people's entire psychology.
- Add one countermeasure. Clarify the ask, change the timing, eat first, bring notes, ask for dissent, set a stop-loss, or schedule a follow-up.
- Stop. Once you have one or two useful countermeasures, return to action.
Murphy Jitsu is most useful when your nervous system is over-anchored to how you want things to go. Chris's frame: expect the unexpected, inconvenient, and suboptimal, because adverse conditions are where preparation becomes a relative advantage.
Research on "prospective hindsight" found that imagining a future event as if it had already happened can change the quality of explanations people generate about possible outcomes. That supports premortem-style thinking as a decision aid, though the evidence falls short of guaranteeing it prevents failure.2
Cognitive canaries catch the shift before your story does
The concept from this episode I keep coming back to is Chris's idea of cognitive canaries: objective signals that tell you your state has changed before your narrative about the situation catches up.
Once you're tilted, flooded, defensive, or depleted, the question "Am I making good decisions?" becomes trivially easy to rationalize. Your mind can generate convincing answers in milliseconds:
- "This time is different."
- "I'm not actually that activated."
- "I just need to push through."
- "Stopping now would be weak."
- "I can recover this if I try harder."
A canary works because it's more observable than your interpretation. Chris's example from poker: swearing out loud, alone in his office. He could debate whether he was "tilting." He could not debate whether he'd just sworn out loud. Once he noticed that signal usually correlated with worse play, he could build a policy around it.
Your canaries might include:
- Speech: interrupting, talking faster, swearing, repeating yourself, explaining too much.
- Body: jaw clenching, chest heat, shallow breathing, leaning aggressively forward, numbness, tunnel vision.
- Attention: checking your phone, refreshing dashboards, losing track of the original goal, rereading the same sentence.
- Decision style: urgency, revenge logic, "just this once," adding risk to make back a loss, refusing to ask for help.
- Relational cues: sarcasm, contempt, withdrawal, needing to be right, wanting the other person to feel your frustration.
The best canary is early, specific, and hard to deny.
Practice
Create your cognitive canary policy
Use this before a high-stakes work block, trading session, launch, negotiation, conflict, or any situation where your state can distort your decisions.
- Choose one arena. Pick a context where your decisions degrade under stress: meetings, email, conflict, investing, parenting, food, alcohol, screens, or deep work.
- Review the last three messy moments. What happened before things went sideways? Look for observable cues, not character judgments.
- Name one canary. Make it concrete: "I interrupt twice," "I check my phone during the block," "I swear out loud," "my chest gets hot," "I start negotiating with my own rule."
- Write an if-then policy. "If I notice this canary, then I take a five-minute walk before the next decision." Or: "If I swear out loud while working, then I stop the session and review after lunch."
- Keep the response small enough to obey. A policy you will follow beats a perfect protocol you will rationalize away.
- Audit weekly. Did the canary appear? Did the policy help? Should the response become softer, firmer, earlier, or more specific?
The point is to give your calmer self a say before reactivity takes over.
Research on implementation intentions gives a useful frame: linking a specific cue to a specific response ("if situation X occurs, then I will do Y") can help translate intentions into action. Policies don't override every emotional state. They do reduce the number of decisions you have to make while your system is already under load.3
Quit sooner, return more often
One of the hardest lessons Chris brought from poker, and one of the most useful for high performers: edge is fleeting.
A table that was profitable an hour ago may no longer be. A player who was clear and patient at the start may now be tired, angry, hungry, or overconfident. The disciplined move is sometimes to stop before your state turns a small disadvantage into a large one.
Translate that into daily life:
- If you're too activated to listen, pause the conversation.
- If you're too depleted for a strategic decision, define the next information-gathering step instead.
- If you're checking metrics compulsively, close the dashboard and schedule the next review.
- If you're writing from resentment, draft the message but don't send it yet.
- If you're trying to solve a body problem with more cognition, eat, hydrate, breathe, move, or sleep first.
Chris's in-the-moment question is simple: Given where I am, what is the next best action?
That question asks you to start with where you actually are, which is the part most people skip. A useful self-check:
- When did I last eat?
- How much water have I had?
- Have I moved today?
- What is my breathing doing?
- What is my posture doing?
- Am I speaking faster or slower than usual?
- Is my attention diffuse, obsessive, or available?
- Do I still have an edge here, or am I trying to force one?
For Nervous System Mastery purposes, this is interoception as decision support. You're checking the body because state is part of the decision context.
Review loops turn resilience from a trait into a trainable system
Chris's improvement principle: progress is proportional to the tightness of your feedback loops. Notice where things stand, compare that with where you want them to be, take a small action, observe what changes.
That's the difference between a useful resilience system and a motivational slogan.
Build three loops:
- Pre-brief: Before a high-stakes situation, ask: "What conditions make good decisions more likely?"
- Canary policy: During the situation, ask: "What objective signal tells me I should pause, downshift, or stop?"
- Post-review: After the situation, ask: "What happened, what did I learn, and what should change next time?"
Chris extends this beyond poker into relationships, teams, health, attention, and work. If something important keeps erupting at inconvenient times, it may be because you haven't created a better time for it. Weekly check-ins with yourself, your partner, or your team catch weak signals before they become crises.
A simple weekly review:
- What mattered this week?
- Where did my state help my decisions?
- Where did my state distort my decisions?
- Which canary appeared most clearly?
- Which policy did I follow or ignore?
- What condition should I create next week?
- What is one experiment I'll run for seven days?
Keep the frame experimental. When a policy fails, adjust the design and run the next experiment.
The short version
- Mental resilience works best when designed before the stressful moment.
- A short pre-performance routine separates controllable process from uncontrollable outcome.
- "Murphy Jitsu" is a premortem: imagine failure, identify likely causes, add one countermeasure, return to action.
- Cognitive canaries are objective early-warning signals that your state is shifting.
- If-then policies reduce the need for in-the-moment judgment when your system is already activated.
- Sometimes the best high-stakes decision is to stop, recover edge, and return later.
- Review loops turn resilience from a trait into a trainable system.
Free assessment
Take the free nervous system assessment.
If pressure, urgency, or reactivity make it hard to notice your own cognitive canaries, the assessment can help you map your current nervous-system patterns and choose a steadier next step.
Take the assessment →Continue exploring
- Read The Art and Science of Interoception for a deeper look at using body signals as actionable data.
- Read The Best Decision-Making Is Emotional for more on why state and emotion are part of decision quality.
- Read Functional Breathwork: Use Interoception to Regulate Your Nervous System for practical ways to match breath practices to state.
- Read Digital Distraction: Reclaim Attention Without Quitting Technology for another guide to cues, attention, and intentional environment design.
References
- Brooks et al. found across several experiments that ritualized pre-performance actions reduced anxiety and improved performance in some public and private performance tasks; this supports cautious experimentation with routines, not blanket claims that any routine improves all outcomes. See "Don't stop believing: Rituals improve performance by decreasing anxiety," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.07.004. ↩
- Mitchell, Russo, and Pennington describe prospective hindsight as generating explanations for a future event as if it had already happened, with implications for decision aiding. See "Back to the future: Temporal perspective in the explanation of events," Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (1989), https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960020103. ↩
- Gollwitzer's implementation-intention research examines if-then plans that link anticipated situations to goal-directed responses, helping people translate intentions into action. See "Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans," American Psychologist (1999), https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493. ↩