Shadow Work and Self-Authorship: A Practical Guide with Erick Godsey

About the guest
Erick Godsey
Erick Godsey is a writer, podcaster, teacher, and host of The Myths That Make Us. His work explores myth, Jungian psychology, dreamwork, Internal Family Systems, behavior change, and how people can discover, articulate, and consciously revise the stories that shape their lives.
Learn more →Listen to the episode
You're already living inside a myth you didn't choose
Most people assume they're reacting to reality as it is. What Erick Godsey suggests is more uncomfortable: you are living inside a story your psyche assembled, often before you chose it consciously, to keep you oriented and emotionally coherent. When that story stops working, the move that actually helps is unglamorous: become conscious of the myth you're living, listen to the parts of you that got exiled along the way, and choose your next true action from a more integrated center.
Erick treats myths, archetypes, depression, grief, dreamwork, and truth-telling as different doors into the same work: self-authorship. The shadow holds more than the ugly material you reject. It can also contain courage, aggression, grief, desire, love, and purpose that you learned to keep outside awareness because they once felt unsafe.
This guide is for you if you're:
- repeating patterns that feel stronger than your conscious intentions;
- trying to understand a trigger without making it your identity;
- questioning an old life story that no longer fits;
- wanting to journal, work with dreams, or practice parts dialogue without turning it into rumination;
- navigating grief, anger, depression, or despair and needing a grounded next step.
1This is a reflection and practice guide, not medical advice, psychiatric advice, or a substitute for therapy, crisis care, or prescribed treatment. If you are in acute distress, suicidal, experiencing mania or psychosis, changing psychiatric medication, or working with trauma that feels destabilizing, involve qualified support and trusted people.
Audit the myth before you try to fix the symptom
Erick's core move is to treat a belief as a tool, not a final truth. You cannot perceive "the world" directly. You act through models, maps, and stories. If a story helps you orient, connect, and act cleanly, it's probably useful. If it repeatedly produces suffering, avoidance, collapse, or dishonesty, it may be time to revise it.
Bodies get sick. People need medication, protection, sleep, food, community, and clinical care. Erick's contribution is narrower: when a symptom is entangled with an old identity, a relationship pattern, or an avoided truth, ask what story your system is trying to preserve.
Try a myth audit:
| Signal | Ask | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Repeating conflict | "What role do I keep casting myself in?" | The rescuer, abandoned one, genius, victim, martyr, rebel, performer |
| Overreaction | "What past danger might my body think is happening again?" | Criticism feels like exile; distance feels like betrayal |
| Collapse | "What future did I believe was guaranteed that reality is disproving?" | Career, relationship, identity, status, spiritual certainty |
| Envy or resentment | "What unlived desire is this pointing toward?" | Art, devotion, erotic aliveness, rest, leadership, truth |
| Chronic stuckness | "What part of me benefits from staying here?" | Safety, belonging, control, innocence, not risking failure |
A cautious research bridge: narrative identity research suggests that people construct evolving life stories that give experience unity, meaning, and direction.1 That does not prove that "rewriting your story" cures illness or trauma. It does support the practical intuition that how you organize your past and future can shape what actions feel available right now.
Depression may contain information your life needs you to hear
Erick pushes back against the oversimplified story that depression is merely a broken machine with low serotonin, and raises a more uncomfortable question: where might your life be out of alignment with what your deeper self knows?
Depression can be life-threatening and has many contributors: biology, grief, trauma, environment, sleep, loneliness, substances, inflammation, life stress, and more. Medication helps many people, and nobody should start, stop, or change psychiatric medication without medical guidance. Erick explicitly leaves room for medication as a stabilizing bridge when someone is too depressed to function.
The tactical version:
- Stabilize first. Sleep, food, safety, medical care, therapy, trusted contact, reduced load.
- Then listen. If the symptom could speak, what would it ask you to stop betraying?
- Separate diagnosis from destiny. A label can help you find care. It doesn't have to become the entire myth of who you are.
- Look for one aligned action. One honest repair, boundary, conversation, walk, appointment, meal, or page of writing. Not a life overhaul.
- Track effects without grandiosity. Did the action increase clarity, capacity, connection, or groundedness? If not, update.
The academic literature is more complicated than popular serotonin slogans suggest. Reviews have questioned a simple low-serotonin explanation for depression, while the broader evidence around medication, psychotherapy, placebo effects, severity, and individual response remains genuinely nuanced.2 That evidence should not be weaponized into "medication is fake" or "heal yourself by willpower." A safer takeaway: avoid one-factor stories. Depression deserves both compassionate care and honest inquiry into life context.
Who's on the throne right now?
Erick gives a practical primer on Internal Family Systems-style parts work. The psyche can be understood as a "throne room" where different parts take over at different times. A frightened protector, avoidant guardian, inner critic, pleaser, addict, rescuer, or rageful defender may seize the throne and act out a strategy that once made perfect sense.
The point is to build enough inner leadership that no single part has to run the kingdom alone.
A parts map can start simply:
| When this happens | The part on the throne might be | It may be trying to protect |
|---|---|---|
| I withdraw from intimacy | The avoider | Not being betrayed, trapped, or humiliated |
| I attack or criticize | The warrior in shadow | Boundaries, dignity, control, not feeling powerless |
| I people-please | The diplomat | Belonging, safety, avoiding abandonment |
| I numb or scroll | The anesthetist | Relief from grief, shame, loneliness, or overwhelm |
| I overthink | The strategist | Certainty before risking action |
IFS and related parts approaches have some preliminary clinical research, but the evidence base is still developing and should be held cautiously.3 For self-practice, keep the frame modest: parts language helps you become curious instead of fused with whatever just hijacked you.
A clean parts dialogue has three rules:
- Do not exile the protector. If a part is intense, assume it has a reason before trying to replace it.
- Ask what it fears would happen if it stopped. This reveals the nervous-system logic beneath the behavior.
- Let the inner king or queen decide. Hear every part, then choose an action that serves the whole system rather than the loudest fear.
Practice
Run a 15-minute shadow council
Use this when a reaction feels disproportionate, compulsive, or familiar. Stop if the practice becomes destabilizing, dissociative, or overwhelming.
- Name the scene. Write: "The moment I am working with is ___." Keep it concrete.
- Name the part on the throne. Give it a neutral label: the Protector, Critic, Pleaser, Warrior, Child, Numb One, Performer, or another name that fits.
- Let it speak uncensored for two minutes. Start with: "I am trying to protect you from ___." Do not argue yet.
- Ask for the fear beneath the strategy. "If you did not do this, what are you afraid would happen?"
- Ask what it needs from your adult self. Reassurance, a boundary, rest, grief, a direct conversation, a plan, protection, or honest attention?
- Consult the whole kingdom. Ask: "What action would honor this part without letting it run my life?"
- Choose one decree. End with a small embodied action you can take within 24 hours: send the text, cancel the commitment, eat, sleep, apologize, ask for help, write three pages, take a walk, or pause before reacting.
The win is moving from possession to relationship.
Journaling, dreamwork, truth-telling, heart-led action
Erick names four practices that keep self-authorship alive between larger breakthroughs: journaling, dreamwork, truth-telling, and leading with the heart rather than only the strategy mind.
1. Journal until you stop performing for yourself. Erick's first major practice came from The Artist's Way: three longhand pages every morning for twelve weeks. The predictable objection is "What if this is a waste of time?" Erick's answer is direct: if you chose the practice because your life needs transformation, stop renegotiating every morning and do the uncomfortable thing.
2. Track dreams as symbolic feedback. Erick describes dream interpretation as one of the most useful tools he has picked up, not because every dream is objectively divine, but because treating dreams as messages from the deeper psyche helped him notice when he was drifting out of alignment.
3. Make truth-telling somatic. He describes learning to feel in his body when he's speaking truth versus playing a social game. That is the Nervous System Mastery-relevant move: authenticity becomes an interoceptive signal you can train yourself to notice, not just a concept you admire.
4. Lead with the heart, not just the strategy mind. For Erick, the "rainmaker" archetype is someone who brings themselves into order and then listens for what the environment needs. In practical terms: regulate, listen, tell the truth, and let the next right action be smaller than your ego prefers.
A simple seven-day ritual stack:
| Day | Practice | Minimum dose |
|---|---|---|
| Every morning | Longhand journal | 10 minutes or three pages |
| On waking | Dream note | One image, emotion, or fragment |
| Before hard conversations | Body truth check | "What am I afraid to say? What would love say cleanly?" |
| Once daily | Shadow council micro-check | "Who is on the throne right now?" |
| Once daily | Loving service | "What is one thing I can do today for someone else purely from love?" |
| Once weekly | Myth review | "What story did I live this week? What story do I want to practice next?" |
| When stuck | Death reminder | "If I knew this sandcastle would be washed away, what would still be worth building?" |
A note on psychedelics: Erick and Jonny discuss microdosing and plant medicine in the episode. This guide is not recommending illegal substances or unsupervised psychedelic use. If you explore altered states, consider legality, medical contraindications, psychiatric history, trauma history, setting, support, and integration. The lower-risk lesson is available without substances: increase your capacity to feel honestly, then act more truthfully.
Grief is evidence of love, and death clarifies what's worth building
Erick's most useful grief frame is unsentimental. He calls grief "felt evidence that you love" and later describes it as digesting attachment to love that didn't get to be expressed. Grief often opens the very capacities that defended adulthood keeps sealed: tenderness, devotion, humility, and the lover archetype that can balance an overactive warrior.
Stop treating grief as a detour from the path. Grief may be part of how the path becomes honest.
Three prompts when grief, death, or existential urgency is present:
- Love: "What love is this grief proving was real?"
- Attachment: "What future, role, identity, or expectation am I being asked to release?"
- Offering: "Given that I will die, what beautiful sandcastle is still worth building today?"
This is not a demand to transmute pain into purpose on a timeline. Erick's own story is slower: his childhood pain around his mother's depression became part of the wound that eventually shaped his work, but he is clear that he cannot save anyone. He can only become more honest and share what has helped him.
A clean standard for self-authorship: don't use your wound to become a savior. Let it make you more precise, more compassionate, and more responsible.
Key takeaways
- A myth is a working story your psyche uses to orient action. Shadow work begins when you notice the story is no longer serving life.
- Depression and despair deserve care, stabilization, and professional support when needed. They may also contain information about alignment, grief, or an old story breaking down.
- Parts work turns "self-sabotage" into inquiry: what protector is trying to help, and what does adult leadership need to decide?
- Journaling, dream tracking, truth-telling, and heart-led action form a practical ritual stack for self-authorship.
- Erick describes the ego as a wolf that can be starved into biting or trained to hunt with the soul.
- Grief can be evidence of love. It can also be a digestion of attachment and a doorway into deeper compassion.
- Death clarifies devotion: build the sandcastle that is beautiful enough to offer before entropy takes it.
Free assessment
Take the free nervous system assessment.
If old stories, protective parts, shutdown, overthinking, or emotional intensity make it hard to act from your deeper values, the assessment can help you map your current nervous-system patterns and choose a steadier next step.
Take the assessment →Continue exploring
- Read Hero's Journey to Wholeness for a complementary guide on identity, descent, and returning with greater wholeness.
- Read Wilderness Rites of Passage for Leadership for more on threshold work, shadow, grief, and integration.
- Read The Art and Science of Interoception to deepen the body-based truth sensing Erick describes.
- Read Reset Your Nervous System for simple regulation practices before intense journaling, conflict, or parts work.
References
- Dan P. McAdams' life-story model of identity describes people as constructing internalized, evolving narratives that provide unity and meaning across time. See McAdams, "The Psychology of Life Stories," Review of General Psychology 5, no. 2 (2001): 100–122, https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100. This is a meaning-making lens, not evidence that narrative work alone treats mental illness. ↩
- For cautious context on the serotonin story, see Moncrieff et al., "The Serotonin Theory of Depression: A Systematic Umbrella Review of the Evidence," Molecular Psychiatry 28 (2023): 3243–3256, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01661-0. This does not imply that individuals should discontinue medication without medical supervision. ↩
- Internal Family Systems has early but still limited empirical support. For example, Shadick et al. reported a proof-of-concept randomized trial of an IFS-based intervention for rheumatoid arthritis and called for future efficacy trials. See Shadick et al., "A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Internal Family Systems-Based Psychotherapeutic Intervention on Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis," Journal of Rheumatology 40, no. 11 (2013): 1831–1841. ↩